5/5/2023 0 Comments Plex lastfm scrobbler linux![]() Again, complete is not synonymous with most-derived.Īlso if I have created an object of Derived like this: Derived d_obj = Derived(), Is the object d_obj is also a "most-derived" object? This is not necessarily a complete object, however, since this could be a class member definition. The most-derived object of b_obj is an object of type Base. So if I have created an object of Base like this: Base b_obj = Base(), Is the object b_obj is "most-derived" object? A most-derived object may be a subobject, so you cannot infer object completeness from most-derivedness (however, you can infer that the most-derived object is of class type).Every complete object of class-type is a most-derived object only if that class inherits.Objects may be of class type, but non-class type objects also exist. A most-derived object is an object of a most-derived class, and a most-derived class must be of a class type. Is every "complete" object is "most-derived" object If I have created an object of Derived like this: Derived d_obj = Derived(), is the object d_obj also a "most-derived" object?ĭoes the word "derived" in "most-derived" mean that the object is an object of a class like MostDerived, or mean that the object has no class subobject in it? If I have created an object of Base like this: Base b_obj = Base(), is the object b_obj a "most-derived" object? Per the question "What does the "most derived object" mean?" I think that (correct me if I am wrong), objects of type "most-derived" class only, like MostDerived, are called "most-derived" objects. I stopped here, I really do not understand the rest of the wording. If a complete object, a member subobject, or an array element is of class type, its type is considered the most derived class An object of a most derived class type or of a non-class type is called a most derived object.įrom the quote what I understand is that a type of a complete object is of "most-derived" class type. I've forgotten that ads even run on YouTube, to the point that it's a jarring experience when I see them on somebody else's screen.I can't understand the wording in this quote from the standard: So why do I still have it? It's cheap for a family (since all members get it) and it's bundled with YouTube Premium, so I don't get YouTube ads. So when I create a playlist and then cast it to my Google Home, some tracks just won't play. Some songs can be played locally, but can't be cast. There are a variety of tracks that have different usage abilities. The old song is removed from the catalog and the new song is added, but playlists only get the removal, so the track just disappears. I think what happens is that your band releases a remastered version of a song that's almost identical. When I asked YouTube Music for a radio station based on The Cure I get 17 out of the first 30 tracks were The Cure. ![]() If I asked for a radio station of The Cure I'd get a nice variety of 80's music matching the genre with The Cure about every 6-8 songs. I used the radio station feature of Play Music heavily to find new stuff. Honorable mention to MusicButler (musicbutler.io) which used to be free and simply notifies you of new releases for a "Release Radar" experience.Īll this combines to be a less seamless but far better experience than using spotify. ) for recommendations, tracking listening, and connecting with friends. Since this is all offline playing downloaded files, I use last.fm which plugs into both Deezer ( ) and Plex (. Plexamp is a beautiful high quality player with no bells and whistles but does one thing really well and that's play my music. Locally on my (phone|laptop|desktop) I use Plexamp ( ). I have a lifetime pass and it's totally worth it, but keep in mind it is required for this setup. My media server, of course, runs Plex ( ). This plugs into my Deezer account and I use it to download FLAC quality audio into my media server. I use Deemix Server ( ) to serve a webapp on my media server. Now, here's the interesting thing: I never use Deezer to listen to music. Tidal, however, has DRM that does not allow it to play on Linux as a webapp nor does it have a Linux desktop app. It's $15/month for HiFi comparable to Tidal's HiFi subscription. Now, I'm a bit of an audiophile and also I'm willing to deal with amounts of jank that others find intolerable.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |